feat(portal): connect risk narrative layers

This commit is contained in:
igor04091968
2026-06-04 15:30:46 +03:00
parent d0e502f622
commit f60cca7f59
4 changed files with 374 additions and 55 deletions
+310 -48
View File
@@ -345,6 +345,10 @@ struct RiskHeatmapItem {
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
critical_candidates: Option<usize>,
heat_level: String,
#[serde(default, skip_serializing_if = "Vec::is_empty")]
links: Vec<RiskNarrativeLink>,
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
summary: Option<String>,
}
#[derive(Clone, Debug, Serialize)]
@@ -362,6 +366,15 @@ struct SecurityCorrelationItem {
open_cases: Option<usize>,
correlation_score: u8,
correlation_reason: String,
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
explanation: Option<String>,
}
#[derive(Clone, Debug, Serialize)]
struct RiskNarrativeLink {
target: String,
label: String,
summary: String,
}
#[derive(Clone, Debug, Serialize)]
@@ -507,6 +520,8 @@ struct ExecutiveDashboardSummary {
main_risk: String,
main_improvement: String,
main_data_gap: String,
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
main_risk_cause: Option<String>,
}
#[derive(Clone, Debug, Serialize)]
@@ -1022,6 +1037,17 @@ struct ReportRuntimeInputs<'a> {
evidence: &'a DlpEvidenceResponse,
}
struct ExecutiveDashboardInputs<'a> {
agent_quality_explain: &'a AgentQualityExplain,
business_risk: &'a [BusinessRiskItem],
business_risk_history_summary: &'a BusinessRiskHistorySummary,
risk_heatmap: &'a [RiskHeatmapItem],
security_correlation: &'a [SecurityCorrelationItem],
candidates: &'a [RiskIncidentCandidate],
cases: &'a CaseFile,
evidence: &'a DlpEvidenceResponse,
}
fn main() {
let code = match run() {
Ok(code) => code,
@@ -2320,12 +2346,16 @@ fn build_reports(
let security_correlation = build_security_correlation(&risk_heatmap);
let executive_dashboard = build_executive_dashboard(
snapshot,
&agent_quality_explain,
&business_risk,
&business_risk_history_summary,
&risk_incident_candidates,
inputs.cases,
inputs.evidence,
ExecutiveDashboardInputs {
agent_quality_explain: &agent_quality_explain,
business_risk: &business_risk,
business_risk_history_summary: &business_risk_history_summary,
risk_heatmap: &risk_heatmap,
security_correlation: &security_correlation,
candidates: &risk_incident_candidates,
cases: inputs.cases,
evidence: inputs.evidence,
},
);
let trend = workforce_trend_json(snapshot);
let insight_items = workforce_insight_items(snapshot);
@@ -2423,23 +2453,8 @@ fn build_reports(
.take(3)
{
executive_points.push(format!(
"Проблемная зона {}: {} — Trust {}, активность {}, покрытие {}, дела {}",
item.department,
item.heat_level,
optional_score_text(item.trust_kpi_score),
optional_score_text(item.activity_score),
optional_score_text(item.agent_coverage_pct),
item.open_cases.unwrap_or(0)
));
}
for item in security_correlation
.iter()
.filter(|item| item.correlation_score > 0)
.take(3)
{
executive_points.push(format!(
"Корреляция Workforce/Security {}: {}/100 — {}",
item.department, item.correlation_score, item.correlation_reason
"Связанная картина риска: {}",
linked_risk_statement(item)
));
}
executive_points.push(format!(
@@ -3044,6 +3059,22 @@ fn build_risk_heatmap(
open_cases,
critical_candidates,
);
let links = risk_narrative_links(
trust_kpi_score,
activity_score,
agent_coverage_pct,
business_risk_level.as_deref(),
open_cases,
critical_candidates,
);
let summary = risk_heatmap_summary(
trust_kpi_score,
activity_score,
agent_coverage_pct,
business_risk_level.as_deref(),
open_cases,
critical_candidates,
);
RiskHeatmapItem {
department,
trust_kpi_score,
@@ -3053,6 +3084,8 @@ fn build_risk_heatmap(
open_cases: Some(open_cases),
critical_candidates: Some(critical_candidates),
heat_level,
links,
summary: Some(summary),
}
})
.collect::<Vec<_>>();
@@ -3222,6 +3255,125 @@ fn heatmap_rank(level: &str) -> u8 {
}
}
fn risk_narrative_links(
trust_kpi_score: Option<u8>,
activity_score: Option<u8>,
agent_coverage_pct: Option<u8>,
business_risk_level: Option<&str>,
open_cases: usize,
critical_candidates: usize,
) -> Vec<RiskNarrativeLink> {
vec![
RiskNarrativeLink {
target: "trust_kpi".to_string(),
label: "Trust KPI".to_string(),
summary: format!(
"Trust KPI {}, активность {}",
optional_score_text(trust_kpi_score),
optional_score_text(activity_score)
),
},
RiskNarrativeLink {
target: "business_risk".to_string(),
label: "Business Risk".to_string(),
summary: format!("уровень {}", business_risk_level.unwrap_or("UNKNOWN")),
},
RiskNarrativeLink {
target: "incident_candidates".to_string(),
label: "Кандидаты".to_string(),
summary: format!("кандидатов высокого риска: {critical_candidates}"),
},
RiskNarrativeLink {
target: "cases".to_string(),
label: "Дела".to_string(),
summary: format!("открытых дел: {open_cases}"),
},
RiskNarrativeLink {
target: "agent_coverage".to_string(),
label: "Покрытие агентов".to_string(),
summary: format!("покрытие {}", optional_score_text(agent_coverage_pct)),
},
]
}
fn risk_heatmap_summary(
trust_kpi_score: Option<u8>,
activity_score: Option<u8>,
agent_coverage_pct: Option<u8>,
business_risk_level: Option<&str>,
open_cases: usize,
critical_candidates: usize,
) -> String {
format!(
"Trust {} → Coverage {} → Business Risk {} → Candidates {} → Cases {} → {}",
optional_score_text(trust_kpi_score),
optional_score_text(agent_coverage_pct),
business_risk_level.unwrap_or("UNKNOWN"),
critical_candidates,
open_cases,
risk_narrative_conclusion(
trust_kpi_score,
activity_score,
agent_coverage_pct,
business_risk_level,
open_cases,
critical_candidates,
)
)
}
fn risk_narrative_conclusion(
trust_kpi_score: Option<u8>,
activity_score: Option<u8>,
agent_coverage_pct: Option<u8>,
business_risk_level: Option<&str>,
open_cases: usize,
critical_candidates: usize,
) -> String {
let mut reasons = Vec::new();
if trust_kpi_score.is_some_and(|value| value < 75) {
reasons.push("слабого Trust KPI");
}
if activity_score.is_some_and(|value| value < 60) {
reasons.push("падения активности");
}
if agent_coverage_pct.is_some_and(|value| value < 90) || agent_coverage_pct.is_none() {
reasons.push("слабого покрытия агентов");
}
if matches!(
business_risk_level.unwrap_or("UNKNOWN"),
"HIGH" | "CRITICAL" | "MEDIUM"
) {
reasons.push("повышенного Business Risk");
}
if critical_candidates > 0 {
reasons.push("критичных кандидатов");
}
if open_cases > 0 {
reasons.push("открытых расследований");
}
if reasons.is_empty() {
"связанный риск не выражен".to_string()
} else {
format!("риск связан из-за {}", reasons.join(", "))
}
}
fn linked_risk_statement(item: &RiskHeatmapItem) -> String {
format!(
"В подразделении {} {}.",
item.department,
risk_narrative_conclusion(
item.trust_kpi_score,
item.activity_score,
item.agent_coverage_pct,
item.business_risk_level.as_deref(),
item.open_cases.unwrap_or(0),
item.critical_candidates.unwrap_or(0),
)
)
}
fn build_security_correlation(heatmap: &[RiskHeatmapItem]) -> Vec<SecurityCorrelationItem> {
let mut items = heatmap
.iter()
@@ -3305,22 +3457,31 @@ fn security_correlation_item(item: &RiskHeatmapItem) -> SecurityCorrelationItem
open_cases: item.open_cases,
correlation_score: score.min(100) as u8,
correlation_reason: reasons.join("; "),
explanation: Some(security_correlation_explanation(item, &reasons)),
}
}
fn security_correlation_explanation(item: &RiskHeatmapItem, reasons: &[String]) -> String {
format!(
"Связаны слои: Trust KPI {}, активность {}, Business Risk {}, кандидаты {}, дела {}. Причина: {}. Для руководителя это означает, что управленческую просадку нужно проверять вместе с качеством данных и очередью ИБ-проверок.",
optional_score_text(item.trust_kpi_score),
optional_score_text(item.activity_score),
item.business_risk_level.as_deref().unwrap_or("UNKNOWN"),
item.critical_candidates.unwrap_or(0),
item.open_cases.unwrap_or(0),
reasons.join("; ")
)
}
fn build_executive_dashboard(
snapshot: &Snapshot,
agent_quality_explain: &AgentQualityExplain,
business_risk: &[BusinessRiskItem],
business_risk_history_summary: &BusinessRiskHistorySummary,
candidates: &[RiskIncidentCandidate],
cases: &CaseFile,
evidence: &DlpEvidenceResponse,
inputs: ExecutiveDashboardInputs<'_>,
) -> ExecutiveDashboard {
let trust_kpi_score = executive_trust_kpi_score(snapshot, agent_quality_explain);
let trust_kpi_score = executive_trust_kpi_score(snapshot, inputs.agent_quality_explain);
let agent_coverage_pct = (snapshot.agent_coverage_sla.expected_nodes > 0)
.then_some(snapshot.agent_coverage_sla.coverage_pct);
let high_risk_departments = business_risk
let high_risk_departments = inputs
.business_risk
.iter()
.filter(|item| business_risk_is_high(&item.risk_level))
.take(10)
@@ -3332,7 +3493,8 @@ fn build_executive_dashboard(
reasons: item.reasons.clone(),
})
.collect::<Vec<_>>();
let critical_candidates = candidates
let critical_candidates = inputs
.candidates
.iter()
.filter(|item| {
matches!(
@@ -3355,13 +3517,14 @@ fn build_executive_dashboard(
.unwrap_or_else(|| "требуется проверка".to_string()),
})
.collect::<Vec<_>>();
let open_cases = cases
let open_cases = inputs
.cases
.cases
.values()
.filter(|item| matches!(item.status.as_str(), "OPEN" | "IN_PROGRESS"))
.count();
let resolved_cases_30d = resolved_cases_30d(cases);
let forensics_readiness = forensics_readiness(snapshot, candidates, evidence);
let resolved_cases_30d = resolved_cases_30d(inputs.cases);
let forensics_readiness = forensics_readiness(snapshot, inputs.candidates, inputs.evidence);
let summary = ExecutiveDashboardSummary {
main_risk: executive_main_risk(
&high_risk_departments,
@@ -3369,11 +3532,16 @@ fn build_executive_dashboard(
&snapshot.agent_coverage_sla,
),
main_improvement: executive_main_improvement(
business_risk_history_summary,
inputs.business_risk_history_summary,
resolved_cases_30d,
&critical_candidates,
),
main_data_gap: executive_main_data_gap(snapshot, agent_quality_explain),
main_data_gap: executive_main_data_gap(snapshot, inputs.agent_quality_explain),
main_risk_cause: executive_main_risk_cause(
inputs.risk_heatmap,
inputs.security_correlation,
&forensics_readiness,
),
};
ExecutiveDashboard {
trust_kpi_score,
@@ -3505,6 +3673,32 @@ fn executive_main_data_gap(
"критичных пробелов в данных не выявлено".to_string()
}
fn executive_main_risk_cause(
risk_heatmap: &[RiskHeatmapItem],
security_correlation: &[SecurityCorrelationItem],
forensics_readiness: &str,
) -> Option<String> {
let top = risk_heatmap
.iter()
.find(|item| !matches!(item.heat_level.as_str(), "LOW" | "UNKNOWN"))?;
let correlation = security_correlation
.iter()
.find(|item| item.department == top.department);
let mut statement = linked_risk_statement(top);
if let Some(item) = correlation.filter(|item| item.correlation_score > 0) {
statement.push_str(&format!(
" Корреляция Workforce/Security: {}/100, {}.",
item.correlation_score, item.correlation_reason
));
}
if !matches!(forensics_readiness, "READY") {
statement.push_str(&format!(
" Готовность Forensics: {forensics_readiness}, доказательная база требует проверки."
));
}
Some(statement)
}
fn build_investigation_pack(
snapshot: &Snapshot,
candidate_id: &str,
@@ -5478,6 +5672,11 @@ fn render_report_markdown(
);
append_risk_heatmap_markdown(&mut text, context.risk_heatmap);
append_security_correlation_markdown(&mut text, context.security_correlation);
append_linked_risk_narrative_markdown(
&mut text,
context.risk_heatmap,
context.security_correlation,
);
append_risk_incident_candidates_markdown(&mut text, context.risk_incident_candidates);
append_incident_review_markdown(&mut text, context.risk_incident_candidates);
append_incident_review_audit_markdown(
@@ -5538,6 +5737,14 @@ fn append_executive_dashboard_markdown(text: &mut String, dashboard: &ExecutiveD
.as_deref()
.unwrap_or("UNKNOWN")
));
text.push_str(&format!(
"- Главная причина риска: {}\n",
dashboard
.summary
.main_risk_cause
.as_deref()
.unwrap_or("связанный риск не выражен")
));
text.push_str(&format!(
"- Главный риск: {}\n",
dashboard.summary.main_risk
@@ -5812,6 +6019,46 @@ fn append_security_correlation_markdown(text: &mut String, items: &[SecurityCorr
}
}
fn append_linked_risk_narrative_markdown(
text: &mut String,
heatmap: &[RiskHeatmapItem],
correlations: &[SecurityCorrelationItem],
) {
text.push_str("\n## Связанная картина риска\n\n");
if heatmap.is_empty() {
text.push_str(
"- Связанная картина риска пока не сформирована: нет данных по подразделениям.\n",
);
return;
}
let correlations_by_department = correlations
.iter()
.map(|item| (item.department.as_str(), item))
.collect::<BTreeMap<_, _>>();
for item in heatmap.iter().take(10) {
let correlation = correlations_by_department
.get(item.department.as_str())
.copied();
let correlation_text = correlation
.map(|value| format!("{}/100", value.correlation_score))
.unwrap_or_else(|| "0/100".to_string());
text.push_str(&format!(
"- {} → Trust {} → Coverage {} → Business Risk {} → Candidates {} → Cases {} → Correlation {} → {}\n",
item.department,
optional_score_text(item.trust_kpi_score),
optional_score_text(item.agent_coverage_pct),
item.business_risk_level.as_deref().unwrap_or("UNKNOWN"),
item.critical_candidates.unwrap_or(0),
item.open_cases.unwrap_or(0),
correlation_text,
item.summary.as_deref().unwrap_or("вывод не сформирован")
));
if let Some(value) = correlation.and_then(|value| value.explanation.as_deref()) {
text.push_str(&format!(" - объяснение: {value}\n"));
}
}
}
fn append_risk_incident_candidates_markdown(
text: &mut String,
candidates: &[RiskIncidentCandidate],
@@ -9502,6 +9749,12 @@ mod tests {
.unwrap()
.contains("не настроен список")
);
assert!(
report["executive_dashboard"]["summary"]["main_risk_cause"]
.as_str()
.unwrap()
.contains("В подразделении")
);
assert_eq!(report["business_risk"].as_array().unwrap().len(), 1);
assert_eq!(report["business_risk"][0]["department"], "Бухгалтерия");
assert_eq!(report["business_risk"][0]["risk_level"], "MEDIUM");
@@ -9533,6 +9786,13 @@ mod tests {
assert_eq!(report["risk_heatmap"][0]["heat_level"], "HIGH");
assert_eq!(report["risk_heatmap"][0]["trust_kpi_score"], 50);
assert_eq!(report["risk_heatmap"][0]["activity_score"], 50);
assert!(report["risk_heatmap"][0]["links"].is_array());
assert!(
report["risk_heatmap"][0]["summary"]
.as_str()
.unwrap()
.contains("Trust")
);
assert!(report["security_correlation"].is_array());
assert_eq!(
report["security_correlation"][0]["department"],
@@ -9545,6 +9805,12 @@ mod tests {
.unwrap()
.contains("покрытие агентов")
);
assert!(
report["security_correlation"][0]["explanation"]
.as_str()
.unwrap()
.contains("Связаны слои")
);
assert_eq!(report["business_risk_history"].as_array().unwrap().len(), 3);
assert_eq!(
report["business_risk_history"][0]["department"],
@@ -9708,17 +9974,7 @@ mod tests {
.as_array()
.unwrap()
.iter()
.any(|item| item.as_str().unwrap().contains("Проблемная зона"))
);
assert!(
report["executive_points"]
.as_array()
.unwrap()
.iter()
.any(|item| item
.as_str()
.unwrap()
.contains("Корреляция Workforce/Security"))
.any(|item| item.as_str().unwrap().contains("Связанная картина риска"))
);
assert!(
report["executive_points"]
@@ -9745,6 +10001,12 @@ mod tests {
.unwrap()
.contains("## Корреляция Workforce ↔ Security")
);
assert!(
report["markdown"]
.as_str()
.unwrap()
.contains("## Связанная картина риска")
);
assert!(
report["markdown"]
.as_str()
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
const state = { tab: "operator", period: "today", links: null, readiness: null, reports: null };
const state = { tab: "operator", period: "today", links: null, readiness: null, reports: null, pendingScrollSelector: null };
function apiBase() {
const path = window.location.pathname;
@@ -337,6 +337,7 @@ function renderExecutiveDashboard(report) {
<div><span class="muted">Закрыто за 30 дней</span><strong>${ui(dashboard.resolved_cases_30d ?? 0)}</strong></div>
</div>
<div class="list compact-list executive-summary-list">
<div class="row compact-row"><strong>Главная причина риска</strong><span class="muted">${ui(summary.main_risk_cause || "связанный риск не выражен")}</span><span></span></div>
<div class="row compact-row"><strong>Главный риск</strong><span class="muted">${ui(summary.main_risk || "нет данных")}</span><span></span></div>
<div class="row compact-row"><strong>Главное улучшение</strong><span class="muted">${ui(summary.main_improvement || "нет данных")}</span><span></span></div>
<div class="row compact-row"><strong>Пробел в данных</strong><span class="muted">${ui(summary.main_data_gap || "нет данных")}</span><span></span></div>
@@ -1360,7 +1361,7 @@ function renderIncidents(data) {
function renderCases(cases) {
const rows = Array.isArray(cases) ? cases.slice(0, 20) : [];
return `
<section class="card cases-card">
<section class="card cases-card" id="cases-section">
<div class="section-head">
<div>
<h3>Дела</h3>
@@ -1533,7 +1534,7 @@ function renderAgentQuality(quality, explain) {
const warn = ["warning", "fallback", "degraded", "error"].includes(String(status).toLowerCase());
const accepted = Boolean(e.kpi_accepted);
return `
<section class="card agent-quality-card">
<section class="card agent-quality-card" id="trust-kpi-section">
<div class="section-head">
<div>
<h3>Достоверность данных агента</h3>
@@ -1665,7 +1666,7 @@ function renderAgentCoverageSla(sla) {
const rows = Array.isArray(s.problem_nodes) ? s.problem_nodes.slice(0, 10) : [];
const status = s.sla_status || "UNKNOWN";
return `
<section class="card agent-coverage-card">
<section class="card agent-coverage-card" id="agent-coverage-section">
<div class="section-head">
<div>
<h3>Покрытие агентов</h3>
@@ -1728,7 +1729,7 @@ function renderBusinessRisk(items) {
const rows = Array.isArray(items) ? items.slice(0, 10) : [];
const worst = rows[0]?.risk_level || "UNKNOWN";
return `
<section class="card business-risk-card">
<section class="card business-risk-card" id="business-risk-section">
<div class="section-head">
<div>
<h3>Риски подразделений</h3>
@@ -1791,6 +1792,7 @@ function renderRiskHeatmap(items) {
<th>Покрытие</th>
<th>Риск</th>
<th>Дела</th>
<th>Связи</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
@@ -1805,6 +1807,7 @@ function renderRiskHeatmap(items) {
<span class="muted small">${ui(item.business_risk_level || "UNKNOWN")} · кандидаты ${ui(item.critical_candidates ?? 0)}</span>
</td>
<td>${ui(item.open_cases ?? 0)}</td>
<td>${renderRiskLayerLinks(item.links)}</td>
</tr>
`).join("") : `
<tr>
@@ -1814,6 +1817,7 @@ function renderRiskHeatmap(items) {
<td>UNKNOWN</td>
<td><span class="badge status-unknown">UNKNOWN</span></td>
<td>0</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
`}
</tbody>
@@ -1823,6 +1827,24 @@ function renderRiskHeatmap(items) {
`;
}
function renderRiskLayerLinks(links) {
const items = Array.isArray(links) ? links : [];
if (!items.length) return "-";
return `<div class="button-row compact-actions">${items.map(link => {
const target = riskLayerTarget(link.target);
return `<button class="small-button" data-risk-layer-tab="${ui(target.tab)}" data-risk-layer-selector="${ui(target.selector)}" title="${ui(link.summary || link.label || "")}">${ui(link.label || link.target || "слой")}</button>`;
}).join("")}</div>`;
}
function riskLayerTarget(target) {
const value = String(target || "");
if (value === "business_risk") return { tab: "operator", selector: "#business-risk-section" };
if (value === "incident_candidates") return { tab: "operator", selector: "#risk-candidates-section" };
if (value === "cases") return { tab: "incidents", selector: "#cases-section" };
if (value === "agent_coverage") return { tab: "operator", selector: "#agent-coverage-section" };
return { tab: "operator", selector: "#trust-kpi-section" };
}
function riskPercentText(value) {
const number = Number(value);
return Number.isFinite(number) ? `${Math.round(number)}%` : "UNKNOWN";
@@ -1863,7 +1885,7 @@ function renderSecurityCorrelation(items) {
<td><span class="badge ${statusClass(item.business_risk_level)}">${ui(item.business_risk_level || "UNKNOWN")}</span></td>
<td>кандидаты ${ui(item.critical_candidates ?? 0)} · дела ${ui(item.open_cases ?? 0)}</td>
<td><strong>${ui(Number(item.correlation_score || 0))}/100</strong></td>
<td>${ui(item.correlation_reason || "связь не выражена")}</td>
<td>${ui(item.explanation || item.correlation_reason || "связь не выражена")}</td>
</tr>
`).join("") : `
<tr>
@@ -1957,7 +1979,7 @@ function renderRiskIncidentCandidates(items) {
const rows = Array.isArray(items) ? items.slice(0, 10) : [];
const worst = rows[0]?.risk_level || "UNKNOWN";
return `
<section class="card risk-candidates-card">
<section class="card risk-candidates-card" id="risk-candidates-section">
<div class="section-head">
<div>
<h3>Кандидаты в инциденты</h3>
@@ -2254,6 +2276,7 @@ async function refresh() {
content.innerHTML = renderSettings(data);
updateFilters(data);
}
consumePendingScroll();
}
function setTab(tab) {
@@ -2270,6 +2293,16 @@ function applySecurityMode(tab) {
document.body.classList.toggle("security-mode", tab === "owner" || tab === "incidents" || tab === "perimeter");
}
function consumePendingScroll() {
const selector = state.pendingScrollSelector;
if (!selector) return;
state.pendingScrollSelector = null;
window.setTimeout(() => {
const target = document.querySelector(selector);
if (target) target.scrollIntoView({ behavior: "smooth", block: "start" });
}, 0);
}
function showError(error) {
document.getElementById("content").innerHTML = `<pre>${escapeHtml(error.stack || error.message || error)}</pre>`;
}
@@ -2297,6 +2330,19 @@ document.addEventListener("click", event => {
setTab("incidents");
});
document.addEventListener("click", event => {
const button = event.target.closest("[data-risk-layer-tab]");
if (!button) return;
const selector = button.dataset.riskLayerSelector || "";
state.pendingScrollSelector = selector;
const tab = button.dataset.riskLayerTab || state.tab;
if (tab === state.tab) {
consumePendingScroll();
} else {
setTab(tab);
}
});
document.addEventListener("click", event => {
const button = event.target.closest("[data-incident-action]");
if (!button) return;
+10
View File
@@ -62,6 +62,9 @@ Business Risk не является автоматическим обвинен
- `summary.main_risk` - главный риск текущего среза;
- `summary.main_improvement` - главное подтвержденное улучшение;
- `summary.main_data_gap` - главный пробел в данных.
- `summary.main_risk_cause` - optional связанная причина риска:
Trust KPI, coverage, Business Risk, candidates, cases и готовность
Forensics.
`risk_heatmap`:
@@ -75,6 +78,10 @@ Business Risk не является автоматическим обвинен
- `critical_candidates` - кандидаты `HIGH`/`CRITICAL`;
- `heat_level` - итоговая зона карты: `LOW`, `MEDIUM`, `HIGH`,
`CRITICAL` или `UNKNOWN`.
- `links` - optional read-only переходы к уже существующим слоям портала:
Trust KPI, Business Risk, кандидаты, дела и покрытие агентов.
- `summary` - optional связанная строка
`Trust → Coverage → Business Risk → Candidates → Cases → вывод`.
`security_correlation`:
@@ -88,6 +95,8 @@ Business Risk не является автоматическим обвинен
- `correlation_reason` - человеко-понятное объяснение связи, например
`низкий Trust KPI + высокий риск` или
`снижение активности + рост кандидатов`.
- `explanation` - optional управленческое объяснение: какие слои связаны,
почему корреляция высокая и что это значит для руководителя.
Элемент `business_risk_history`:
@@ -333,6 +342,7 @@ POST /api/cases/{case_id}/status
## Сводка руководителя
## Карта рисков подразделений
## Корреляция Workforce ↔ Security
## Связанная картина риска
## Риски подразделений
## Динамика бизнес-рисков
## Кандидаты в инциденты
+1
View File
@@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ async function main() {
const requiredExecutive = [
"Сотрудников в работе",
"Средний индекс активности",
"Главная причина риска",
"Достоверность данных агента",
"Стабильность агента за 7 дней",
"Качество данных по рабочим местам",